|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 31, 2005 12:36:18 GMT -5
It seems to me that the MG concept is fairly over-used now. In MGS3, MG, MG2, and MGS there is only one tank, one threat. A walking tank that can launch nukes. Look at MGS2 and MGS4. MG's all over the damn place, and not nuke-equiped. And Arsenal Gear? How is it a "walking" tank? It's just seems that the series is branching away from its original concepts.
|
|
|
|
Post by ipoder on Dec 31, 2005 16:32:59 GMT -5
AG, it seems to me that the series you became, hell, obsessed with, your now trying to exploit. Try to enjoy the series, not try to find something bad about it. Not trying to be an ass, but your not acting like the AG I used to know. No offence.
As for the concept, I think it's accually doing well, other than not being used.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthony on Dec 31, 2005 19:15:32 GMT -5
The MG series has evolved, so expect more and more changes.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowf0x on Jan 5, 2006 21:02:33 GMT -5
Well I could probably explain what answer AG is looking for...Times change and so do the situations, because of that it is why the Metal Gear's change overtime to meet the specific requirments of the times.
|
|
|
|
Post by thehappycamper on Jan 10, 2006 18:25:15 GMT -5
When was arsenal referred to as a walking battle tank? Wasnt that the whole point of calling it arsenal gear instead of metal gear, to distinguish between the two?
|
|
