|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 22, 2005 13:45:38 GMT -5
Remember those trailers that said "ReLive the past to survive the future"? They all make perfect sense now. Since we have all relived the past (MGS3), we are now ready to take on the future with full understanding of what we are doing. Think about it. If we didn't know about all of the things that were mentioned in MGS3, we probably wouldn't have a very good idea of what we are doing or why we are doing it in MGS4. Anyone agree?
|
|
|
|
Post by Otty on May 22, 2005 13:59:12 GMT -5
Good point! MGS3 played a very big role in the "Solid" games. It might clear up some stuff in MGS4.
|
|
[creepy little bastard]
Guest
|
Post by [creepy little bastard] on May 22, 2005 15:05:42 GMT -5
kinda f...cked the timeline, if you ask me, we were on a clear path to the events after the Big Shell, and MGS3 quantum leaped us into 1964!
|
|
|
|
Post by genaside2 on May 22, 2005 20:09:39 GMT -5
Yeah good thought Mike.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebrotheroflight on May 23, 2005 0:58:23 GMT -5
Pretty stupid point, if you ask me, "Mike". You who know so much should know how extremly important MGS3 is to the theme.
|
|
|
|
Post by blacknail on May 23, 2005 1:57:49 GMT -5
That makes absolute sense, good job. It will probably help us with more up to date AI, as MGS4 compared to MGS2 AI will almost definatly be an extreame change, so MGS3 helped us with an AI system closer to MGS4? Just a thought.
They say this will be the hardest yet, I think MG is! Even though I only breifly played it, I will play it in full soon enough.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 23, 2005 6:24:36 GMT -5
Pretty stupid point, if you ask me, "Mike". You who know so much should know how extremly important MGS3 is to the theme. Um, I just said it was important, Leiner. This is why we should just call each other by our forum names and not our real ones, Chris. |
|
|
|
Post by thebrotheroflight on May 23, 2005 6:26:49 GMT -5
Sorry, Soldier, wasn't mad at you. It was directed at Gen.
Anyway, I actually agree with you. Didn't read the first post, so I just jumped to the conclusion it had to be something stupid since Gen liked it.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 23, 2005 6:31:47 GMT -5
No problem, just read the posts a bit more thouroghly before you post back. We don't need another ZappBrannigan around here.
|
|
|
|
Post by genaside2 on May 23, 2005 7:48:19 GMT -5
Sorry, Soldier, wasn't mad at you. It was directed at Gen.
Anyway, I actually agree with you. Didn't read the first post, so I just jumped to the conclusion it had to be something stupid since Gen liked it. What the HELL ? Seriously what the hell are you talking about? You serioulsly make no sense to me whatsoever. Oh my god. This is making me mad. |
|
dirk
Grunt (level 1)
Posts: 41
|
Post by dirk on May 23, 2005 8:14:03 GMT -5
the fact that he read a single post (not even the original) and jumped to conclusions shows total ignorance.
|
|
|
|
Post by genaside2 on May 23, 2005 16:48:42 GMT -5
Of tBOL?
|
|
dirk
Grunt (level 1)
Posts: 41
|
Post by dirk on May 24, 2005 4:30:28 GMT -5
yeah, i think it's pretty lame to diss someone's thread when you haven't even read the post that started it
|
|
|
|
Post by thebrotheroflight on May 24, 2005 4:49:03 GMT -5
Well, I did read the first post, the entire thread actually. But then Gen said something about a Mike (I know now that's The Soldier), and I didn't know who Mike were. So I thought Mike was [creepy little bastard], and what [creepy little bastard] said was plain f...cking stupid.
So sorry Gen and The Soldier.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 24, 2005 5:47:35 GMT -5
Further proof that we should leave real names out of the forum.
|
|
