|
Post by A.G. on Dec 15, 2007 0:31:45 GMT -5
So, has anyone seen it yet? I just saw it today, and just as I thought, the first half was great and the second half (and the ending) sucked.
I dont' want to ruin it for anyone, so let me know if you've seen it so we can talk about it. The "stupid" things can't be discussed without spoilers.
|
|
|
Post by anomaly on Dec 15, 2007 0:36:19 GMT -5
I saw it. On the IMAX. That and the fact that I hadnt seen any of the previous movies, nor read the book, are what made me like this movie. There were some unexplained parts that I wish they've would've gone into more, but I didnt care for it; the pros overweighted the cons.
In all seriousness though, it looked freaking sweet on the IMAX. Almost as good as the first five minutes of the Batman movie that was shown during the previews (that bank heist was awesome).
|
|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 15, 2007 1:16:13 GMT -5
Spoilers!!!!
OK, so you like it then? I mean, it didn't bother you that:
1. The infected go from mindless drones to setting boobie traps, performing coperative attacks, being able to track, displaying emotion (anger/revenge when Will snagged one of them), leadership displays, and problem solving abilities. And yet they couldn't understand him... That's is the stupidest thing I've ever seen!
2. The "leader" of the "zombies" had three pet dogs!!! WTF!!! On a leash at that!!!
3. No third act to be found.
4. EVERYONE in his family died... the survivors of the movie didn't come in until the second half.
5. The grenade ending! WTF!!! The whole point of a grenade would be to THROW it! Not launch yourself with it! f...ck, the zombies would blow up JUST as well if Will wasn't holding the grenade at the time it blew up. That "sacrifice" was just downright dumb!
Don't get me wrong, Will did a GREAT job, perhaps the best I've seen him do. And abondoned New York look terrific. But CGI was sh*t! I mean the zombies looked like sh*t. And the lions at the begining?! I almost threw up! This was supposed to be blockbuster and the special effects looked B-movie at best...
I'm sorry, but I don't think that the pros outweight the cons, more like the other way around. Here's what I think would've made the move better:
1. A third act and a descent ending! 2. Better, MUCH better CGI! 3. Less CGI all together and more real things. Real lions, real deer, real people in make-up!
The movie, "just kinda ended"... it was like, "huh? it's over?" I don't think the crowd at the theater I went to was impressed. First half was gripping and intelligent. Second half was kinda like "Twin Snakes", over the top and without a point.
|
|
|
Post by anomaly on Dec 15, 2007 1:25:22 GMT -5
God you're worse than a movie critic. You're just too hard to please, and I pity that you didnt have a good time with this movie cause you looked way too much into things. Piece of advice, next time you go to the movies, just sit back and stop looking too much into it. I guarantee you that you'll enjoy it better.
|
|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 15, 2007 1:44:05 GMT -5
Too much? The things I mentioned are BLUNT! I can't ignore things that are outright stupid. A zombie displaying emotion, luring Will into a trap, setting a boobie trap, and the attacking him with his pets... You don't have to look "too much into" that to see the stupidity.
And like I said, I loved the first part of the movie. Starting with the boobie trap set by a zombie the movie FELL downhill.
|
|
|
Post by anomaly on Dec 15, 2007 1:57:17 GMT -5
Its called instinct. Just how cats eventually know to crap in the litter box, they learned Robert's way. The man captured a ton of them, they eventually learned how to hunt by observing him. Whats so bad about that? And the pets part, Im not even gonna go there 'cause I fail to see what's so bad about that. Seriously, you want everything to be TOO realistic. Its a damn movie, and good one too.
You should be complaining about more important things, like how in the hell did that woman and her kid survive all this time when all she had with her was handgun. Instead you complain about pets? Wow.
Im done here. Got nothing else to say.
|
|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 15, 2007 15:21:31 GMT -5
Well gee I'm sorry, one slipped my mind!!! But the movie was so full of crap that I guess some just didn't make my list.
Must you start sh*t with me over EVERYTHING? I mean, the times that you and I actually had a descent conversation can probably be counted on one hand! Must you always take your digs at me? So I didn't like a movie that you wet your pants over, so what? I gave good reasons why I didn't care for it. Doesn't mean you need to get all defensive and in my face! Telling me how I should watch movies... f...ck! Don't really think I need your input on how to watch or enjoy a movie! Been watching them successfully without your help for over a quarter of a century now.
|
|
|
Post by anomaly on Dec 15, 2007 20:11:03 GMT -5
The reason I cant have a good conversation with you is 'cause when you get too much into something you talk like a teenager on PMS, with all the exclamation points, locked caps, and cursing. It's hard to take someone seriously whenever I see posts like that. Not worth my time arguing with someone like that.
|
|
Black Snake
Snake (level 3)
They did it for great justice!
Posts: 980
|
Post by Black Snake on Dec 15, 2007 20:26:21 GMT -5
Locked to avoid unecessary conflicts.
anomaly, people have opinions. There is no need to get butthurt over AGs.
|
|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 15, 2007 22:48:14 GMT -5
You know what, you're full of sh*t! The reason why I get mad is because of your BS comments. Hell, look at the dang thread: First I pointed out the reasons I didn't like the movie. List what I didn't like and why. Then YOU come back with this: f...ck you anomoly! Right there you started all that with you "advise". I don't need you telling me how to watch movies and what to like or dislike. And I get "too much into something" because of BS attitude from "ooooooh shiny CGI so it must be good" movie "experts" like you. Yeah... I mean why take seriously someone who: a. Was simply expressing his opinion on the movie. b. Stated the problems and back them up with evidence and explainations. It's far more credible to listen someone like YOU! Someone who doesn't care about little things like Plot, Logic, or even craftsmenship of a film and offers sarcastic "advise" in the form of backhand remarks. Oh yeah, you're a credible one! jerk!
|
|
|
Post by A.G. on Dec 16, 2007 1:02:10 GMT -5
Topic UNLOCKED! 1. First of all, jackass, I didn't lock the topic, Black Snake did. Mods have the power to lock threads too, and in all respect he did do the right thing. As for you, READ first, point fingers second! 2. "THATS what I meant when I said you acted like a teenager with PMS. " I really could care less how you interprete my posts. I post any damn well I please and your perseptions of it do not interest me. PMS huh? Well, perhaps I should use the sarcastic bonehead approach you do, huh? 3. "you werent just pointin out your dislikes of the movie, you were COMPLAINING like a damn loser" Excuse me?! "loser"? How am I a loser for not licking stupid parts of a movie? I think maybe the moron that does like things of that nature is the real loser. And again, MY OPINION, idiot! Who are you to tell me I can't express it? NOBODY! 4. "Responded with the truth, and of course, like always you cant take it." You? Truth? Ha! Since when? You tell me how I should watch movies and what I should and should not "complain" about... f...ck, I paid the money to see it, so I damn well have the right to say what I please on it. And I certainly don't need your input on the matter. 5. "When you can have a conversation where you wont lose your mind so easily, talk to me then. Until then, go insult someone else because I wont take your sh*t anymore." I only "lost my mind" when a pissant like you started telling what I should do and how I should do it. Sorry if you never got that impression before, but you opinion doesn't really matter that much to me. "Won't take my sh*t anymore"? Really? And what exactly was it that I made you "take"? Here's the bottom line, I didn't like something and I expressed it. As usual, you disagreed and immediatly started with your digs on me, telling me what I can or can't say. Well guess what, if I paid my money to play a game or watch a movie I will say what I want and how I want. CAPS, !!!!!!! ?!!!!!!! SYMBOLS... whatever the f...ck I please. You just flat out can't take it that I showed EXACTLY why the movie you f...cking masterbated to blows! Can't really take that one seriously, champ, since it's coming from someone who supports "I Am Legend". Not a very credible source.
|
|
|
Post by anomaly on Dec 16, 2007 1:27:27 GMT -5
whysoserious, AG? ><
Dont really see the point of opening this again, you could've just PMd me back. Just another opportunity to make yourself look like a loose canon, so it's just fine by me I guess.
And I'll quote myself,
So you can close this. And take some anger management classes.
On another note, before someone decides to close this again, I just finished watching "The Last Man On Earth", which is the original movie. Really liked it, considering I know nothing of 1960's cinematography. The story was a lot better than "I am Legend" too. Vincent Price ftw.
Its on youtube btw, so if anyone wants to check it out just do a search there.
And finally, as much as I liked "I am Legend", the TDK Prologue was much better. ><
|
|