|
|
Post by Genaside II on May 7, 2006 12:43:24 GMT -5
I have never played it but really want to.
|
|
FoxDie
Snake (level 3)
Posts: 732
|
Post by FoxDie on May 7, 2006 14:57:05 GMT -5
Yup. Downloaded it and played a few stages. It was ok. I wouldn't buy it, and its not total sh*t, its in the middle. It's nice looking and all, but it gets pretty dull after a while, when you notice the repetiveness of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Genaside II on May 7, 2006 17:20:15 GMT -5
Downloaded?
|
|
|
|
Post by Econs on May 7, 2006 17:40:11 GMT -5
I played a demo, and I died in the first four seconds.
f...cking sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 7, 2006 19:26:32 GMT -5
Not only that, but once again, it's too f...cking short. When are developers going to start making games that take a long f...cking time to beat?
|
|
Black Snake
Snake (level 3)
They did it for great justice!
Posts: 980
|
Post by Black Snake on May 7, 2006 19:48:23 GMT -5
How was I amped up for this game? Too short, too gunplayish. DK, its kind of a long explanation, but long story short, If they take too long to make a game, unless they have multi layers of developers (coughsquareenixcough), they're gonna start losing money. They need to make a game in a year or two so they can get the rolls of money. San Andreas was genius though. Take Two and Rockstar made a game in about two years that took the industry by surprise.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dumpster Keeper on May 7, 2006 23:55:41 GMT -5
Ever notice how all the best games are years in the making? Trust me, there's plenty of money to be made if a game is good enough. If the game is better overall, it will sell more copies, and they will still make bank.
|
|
"